TimeLens2: Generalist Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs
State-of-the-Art Comparison:
TimeLens2 models outperform prior open-source and proprietary models across seven benchmarks. The 2B, 4B, and 8B variants improve over their Qwen3-VL backbones by 14.2, 13.0, and 18.1 average mIoU points, respectively. The 4B model surpasses the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model on every benchmark.
| Model | Size | Charades TL (mIoU) | ActivityNet TL (mIoU) | QVHighlights TL (mIoU) | VUE-TR (mIoU) | VUE-TR-V2 (mIoU) | MomentSeeker (mIoU) | Ego4D-NLQ (mIoU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TimeLens2-2B | 2B | 53.4 | 55.4 | 67.0 | 51.1 | 43.8 | 24.3 | 16.8 |
| Qwen3-VL-2B (Backbone) | 2B | 43.4 | 39.9 | 52.2 | 31.4 | 24.1 | 12.4 | 9.3 |
| TimeLens2-4B | 4B | 57.7 | 59.0 | 69.3 | 53.2 | 48.1 | 27.9 | 18.6 |
| Qwen3-VL-4B (Backbone) | 4B | 49.4 | 50.7 | 62.3 | 33.6 | 20.3 | 15.3 | 11.4 |
| TimeLens2-8B | 8B | 58.6 | 58.6 | 70.2 | 53.5 | 47.7 | 28.5 | 19.0 |
| Qwen3-VL-8B (Backbone) | 8B | 47.2 | 48.0 | 59.4 | 25.5 | 14.0 | 9.8 | 5.3 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Proprietary | 52.8 | 58.1 | 70.4 | 21.9 | - | - | - |
| Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | 397B | 47.5 | 53.8 | 65.8 | 42.2 | 34.5 | 23.3 | 14.5 |
Ablation on TimeLens2-93K Data:
- Training a Qwen3-VL-4B model on the full TimeLens2-93K dataset improves average mIoU from 34.7 (backbone) to 45.8.
- The first 5% of TimeLens2-93K provides the largest gain, raising average mIoU to 42.8.
- Despite containing only declarative queries, TimeLens2-93K improves performance on the question-form MomentSeeker benchmark from 15.3 to 25.8 mIoU.
- The final SFT data mixture includes TimeLens2-93K, TimeLens-100K, and Ego4D-NLQ, reaching an average mIoU of 46.4.
Ablation on Label Curation Pipeline:
Each stage of the data curation pipeline progressively improves label quality and model performance, demonstrating a quality-over-quantity effect. The full cascade improves mIoU by 3.8 points over raw labels from the Qwen annotator, using only 1/8th of the data.
| Curation Stage (Qwen-anchored) | QA Turns (K) | Average mIoU |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B labels | 735.4 | 42.0 |
| + Temporal consensus | 174.2 | 43.4 (+1.4) |
| + Semantic verification | 93.2 | 44.1 (+0.6) |
| + Boundary refinement | 93.2 | 45.8 (+1.7) |
Ablation on Reward Design:
- The proposed temporal Wasserstein reward (R_TW) with uniform support consistently improves over a tIoU-only reward, raising average mIoU from 47.0 to 47.7.
- R_TW outperforms matched NGIoU, which achieves 47.1 average mIoU, with the largest gaps on multi-interval benchmarks VUE-TR (1.4 points) and VUE-TR-V2 (1.0 point).
- R_TW is most effective on predictions with zero tIoU. It helps recover positive overlap for 21.9% of near misses (normalized gap ≤ 1x) vs. only 5.7% of far misses (gap > 5x).
- Adding R_TW to the reward function rescues 75.8% of GRPO groups that would otherwise have an all-zero tIoU reward, creating a non-constant learning signal. It reduces constant-reward groups from 13.8% to 3.6% and nearly doubles the mean absolute advantage.
Ablations on Training Recipe:
- Increasing the maximum packed sequence length for SFT from 16K to 100K tokens improves average mIoU from 44.4 to 46.4, with the largest gains on long-video benchmarks.
- Using diverse instructions and response formats during SFT improves average mIoU by 0.9 points over a fixed format, from 44.9 to 45.8.
The authors conclude that treating temporal evidence as an interval set from supervision through optimization is key to making video MLLMs reliable. The TimeLens2-93K dataset, created via a verifiable annotation pipeline, and the temporal Wasserstein reward, which provides geometry-aware feedback, enable compact models (2B, 4B, 8B) to achieve state-of-the-art performance across diverse grounding tasks. This approach elevates temporal grounding from a specialized task to a native, auditable capability for generalist video MLLMs.
Don't read this site daily. Get it in your inbox.
The daily brief and Sunday deep dive — distilled, scored, and opinionated. For builders only.